|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Compare/contrast fiber lasers to free-space lasers
- Fiber Dispersion and Nonlinearities
- Mode-locking in fiber lasers
|
|
7
|
- Elements of mode-locked lasers
- Pump source
- Gain element
- Saturable absorber for mode-locking
- Dispersion compensation for
shortest pulses
|
|
8
|
- Advantages
- Easy to align fiber laser cavity
- Less sensitive to misalignment
- Passive optical elements are inexpensive
- Uses less power than Ti:sapphire laser
- More compact
- Disadvantages
- More sensitive to environment (polarization)
- Optical fiber limits total laser power
- All fiber cavity limits ability to easily experiment with laser design
- Careful dispersion and nonlinearity management is needed for proper
laser design
|
|
9
|
- Use a fiber that is highly doped with Er as the gain element of the
laser
- This fiber exhibits normal dispersion : D=-70 ps/nm-km
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Self Phase Modulation (SPM)
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Active Mode-locking
- Typically use AOM or Mach Zehnder to achieve mode locking
- Sigma laser (Duling et al, Opt Lett Vol 21, 21 1996)
- Advantage: Can achieve high
repetition rates (10 GHz)
- Passive Mode-locking
- Interferometric designs based on gain and saturable absorber sections
- Figure eight lasers (Sacnac switch)
- Stretched Pulse Lasers
- Advantage: sub-picosecond, high energy pulses
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Measure offset frequency fo as shown and lock to zero
- Phase-lock fr directly to an rf synthesizer
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Most existing frequency combs limited to Ti:Sapphire laser-based systems
- No self-referenced frequency combs from a mode-locked fiber laser in use
- Locking of a fiber laser to other stabilized sources have been
achieved*
- Until recently a full octave from fiber laser not available*
- A fiber-based frequency comb can provide
- Compact, inexpensive design
- Potential for stable “hands-free” operation
- Optical frequency metrology in the IR
- * References
- F. Tauser et al, Opt. Express 11, 594 (2003)
- F.-L. Hong et al, Opt. Lett. 28, 1 (2003)
- J. Rauschenberger et al., Opt. Express 10, 1404 (2002)
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- Stabilized frequency combs have revolutionized optical clocks
- Previous systems limited to 400 nm to 1300 nm
- Fiber laser-based frequency comb demonstrated
- Potentially more robust than Ti:sapphire laser based frequency comb
- Extend phase-lock frequency combs into the IR
- Permit unprecedented accuracy in IR frequency metrology
- Can lock frequency comb to Cesium time standard or other atomic
standard
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
- SRS is from the non-instantaneous component of the c(3)
susceptibility
- SRS typically leads to a frequency downshift of the incident light
- The Raman gain curve (gR) characterizes the frequency
downshift (Dn) acquired by the incident light
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
- Solitons are formed after a balance of GVD and SPM
- Higher order dispersion and nonlinearities cause soliton breakup
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
- Need enough EDF to provide sufficient gain in the laser cavity
- Need enough SMF to provide adequate nonlinear polarization
- Net cavity dispersion is anomalous:
- Net cavity dispersion is slightly normal
- Net cavity dispersion is strongly normal
|
|
61
|
- Sidebands (Kelly sidebands) indicative of soliton propagation
- Inhibiting soliton formation increases spectral bandwidth
|
|
62
|
- Sounds great, but can you do it?
- Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser + novel nonlinear fiber (‘00)
- D. J. Jones et al. Science 288, 635 (2000)
- Broadband Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser
(‘01/’02)
- Morgner et al., PRL, 86, 5462,’01,
T. Ramond et al., Opt. Lett 27, 1842
- Femtosecond Er Fiber laser +
novel nonlinear fiber (‘03)
- Washburn et al., accepted to Opt. Lett, Oct. ‘03
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
|